Overview
Aider — AI pair programming in your terminal
Aider is an open-source AI pair programming tool that runs in the terminal. It works with your local git repo, uses LLMs (Claude, GPT-4, etc.) to edit code based on your instructions, and automatically commits changes. It handles multi-file edits and complex refactoring.
Works in any terminal
Git-native — auto-commits changes
Supports Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini
Multi-file edits
Features & capabilities
Everything it does, in plain English.
FeatureWorks in any terminalIncluded
FeatureGit-native — auto-commits changesIncluded
FeatureSupports Claude, GPT-4o, GeminiIncluded
FeatureMulti-file editsIncluded
PlatformsTerminal (any OS)
The honest take
Where it shines, where it stumbles.
✓ Pros
- ✓Open source and free
- ✓Works with any editor
- ✓Excellent multi-file handling
- ✓Git-aware workflow
! Watch-outs
- !Terminal-only (no GUI)
- !Requires LLM API keys
- !Learning curve
- !Token costs for large repos
Who it's for
Where Aider pays for itself fast.
— Use case
AI-assisted code writing
— Use case
Complex refactoring
— Use case
Bug fixing
— Use case
Feature implementation
— Use case
Code exploration
Community reviews
Share your take on Aider
Sign in to leave a verified review.
B
★★★★★
1 months ago
Changed how I work completely
Best-in-class, period. The interface is intuitive enough that I didn't need to read any docs. Customer support responded within hours and solved my issue. My team adopted this immediately after I shared it with them.
Z
★★★★★
4 months ago
Happy with my subscription
Pleasantly surprised by the quality. It integrates well with VS Code / Slack / Notion — my daily drivers. The free tier is genuinely generous compared to competitors. Pricing is fair for the value you get. The learning curve was steeper than expected.
R
★★★★★
4 months ago
Not worth it for me
Lots of bugs and issues. The outputs require minimal editing — saves so much back-and-forth. A few missing integrations I'd like to see added.
A
★★★★★
6 months ago
Has potential, needs polish
Has potential, but needs polish. Performance is fast — no noticeable latency even on large inputs. Performance is fast — no noticeable latency even on large inputs.
S
★★★★★
7 months ago
Happy with my subscription
Genuinely useful — glad I tried it. The free tier is genuinely generous compared to competitors. My only complaint is the pricing could be more competitive. Will continue using this long-term.
D
★★★★★
7 months ago
Okay product, not amazing
Mixed feelings, but ultimately positive. My team adopted this immediately after I shared it with them. The mobile experience could use some work.
N
★★★★★
8 months ago
A must-have for any professional
Seriously impressive. The free tier is genuinely generous compared to competitors. The ROI was clear within the first week of using it. Best tool in this category, hands down.
S
★★★★★
8 months ago
Had some issues
Had high hopes, fell short. I've recommended this to at least 10 colleagues already. The collaboration features are genuinely well thought-out. Customer support response times could be faster.
B
★★★★★
9 months ago
Solid product, recommended
Recommended for anyone in my field. Performance is fast — no noticeable latency even on large inputs. Keep up the great work, team.
Y
★★★★★
9 months ago
Happy with my subscription
Works really well for my use case. Pricing is fair for the value you get. The recent updates have addressed most of my initial concerns. Would recommend to anyone in my industry.
K
★★★★★
12 months ago
Useful and reliable
Good value for the price. The customization options let me tailor it to my exact workflow. The free tier is genuinely generous compared to competitors. My only complaint is the pricing could be more competitive.
A
★★★★★
1 years ago
Worth every cent
One of the best investments I've made. The API is well-documented and easy to work with. I use this daily and it's become essential to how I work. Pricing is fair for the value you get. My team is very happy with the results.
J
★★★★★
1 years ago
Had some issues
Lots of bugs and issues. The customization options let me tailor it to my exact workflow. Customer support response times could be faster.
S
★★★★★
1 years ago
Exactly what I needed
One of the best investments I've made. The free tier is genuinely generous compared to competitors. Performance is fast — no noticeable latency even on large inputs.
L
★★★★★
1 years ago
Decent but has room to grow
Does the job, nothing more. The recent updates have addressed most of my initial concerns. I've tried 5 similar tools and this one is clearly the best in class.
Alternatives
Similar tools worth comparing.
Cursor
AI-first code editor built on VS Code
n8n
Fair-code workflow automation platform with native AI capabilities. Combine visual building with custom code, self-host or cloud, 400+ integrations.
Ollama
Run large language models locally
Roo Code
Roo Code gives you a whole dev team of AI agents in your code editor.
Context7
Context7 Platform -- Up-to-date code documentation for LLMs and AI code editors
SWE Agent
SWE-agent takes a GitHub issue and tries to automatically fix it, using your LM of choice. It can also be employed for offensive cybersecurity or competitive coding challenges. [NeurIPS 2024]